Thursday, March 19, 2020

Free Essays on Police Riots Of 1857

Political corruption in the 1800’s destroyed the City of New York. The combination of feuding police forces and increasing gang activity in the mid 1800’s made New York a very unsafe place. In 1857, the feuds and rivalries of the police had culminated and turned New York City into a war zone. New York State created its own police district in 1857, which compromised the city’s force. New York then had two police departments, of equal strength and each regarding the other as an outlaw force. One was Fernando Wood’s Municipal Police and the other was the state’s Metropolitan Police, headed by Frederick Talmadge. The decent people of the city began to worry, knowing that the day would soon come when they would be left alone on corrupted streets to fend for themselves. The feud raged just as the people had thought. Members of the two forces were no longer concerned with the public’s safety and became entirely tied up in their vendettas against each other. Criminals were thriving on the feud. Respectable people were now being held up at gunpoint in broad daylight. The officers would literally fight over a criminal and allow the assailant to escape while differences were settled. The city was mayhem, and was overflowing with corruption. The police riot on the steps of city hall, on June 16, 1857, was the culmination of the forces’ corruption. The Republicans at Albany shortened Mayor Fernando Wood's second term of office from two years to one while creating the Metropolitan Police Force, with Frederick Talmadge as superintendent. Talmadge demanded that Wood disband the Municipal Police and Wood refused urging his men to stand by him. Municipal superintendent George W. Matsell, 15 captains and 800 patrolmen of the Municipal Police backed Mayor Wood. 300 others abandoned him. Captain George W. Walling was one of those who pledged his loyalty to the Metropolitan Police and was rewarded by being ordered to arrest... Free Essays on Police Riots Of 1857 Free Essays on Police Riots Of 1857 Political corruption in the 1800’s destroyed the City of New York. The combination of feuding police forces and increasing gang activity in the mid 1800’s made New York a very unsafe place. In 1857, the feuds and rivalries of the police had culminated and turned New York City into a war zone. New York State created its own police district in 1857, which compromised the city’s force. New York then had two police departments, of equal strength and each regarding the other as an outlaw force. One was Fernando Wood’s Municipal Police and the other was the state’s Metropolitan Police, headed by Frederick Talmadge. The decent people of the city began to worry, knowing that the day would soon come when they would be left alone on corrupted streets to fend for themselves. The feud raged just as the people had thought. Members of the two forces were no longer concerned with the public’s safety and became entirely tied up in their vendettas against each other. Criminals were thriving on the feud. Respectable people were now being held up at gunpoint in broad daylight. The officers would literally fight over a criminal and allow the assailant to escape while differences were settled. The city was mayhem, and was overflowing with corruption. The police riot on the steps of city hall, on June 16, 1857, was the culmination of the forces’ corruption. The Republicans at Albany shortened Mayor Fernando Wood's second term of office from two years to one while creating the Metropolitan Police Force, with Frederick Talmadge as superintendent. Talmadge demanded that Wood disband the Municipal Police and Wood refused urging his men to stand by him. Municipal superintendent George W. Matsell, 15 captains and 800 patrolmen of the Municipal Police backed Mayor Wood. 300 others abandoned him. Captain George W. Walling was one of those who pledged his loyalty to the Metropolitan Police and was rewarded by being ordered to arrest...

Monday, March 2, 2020

The Study of Suicide by Emile Durkheim

The Study of Suicide by Emile Durkheim Le Suicide  by founding sociologist Émile Durkheim is a classic text in sociology that is widely taught to psychology students. Published in 1897, the book was the first to present a sociological study of suicide, and its conclusion that suicide can have origins in social causes rather than just being due to individual temperament, was groundbreaking at the time. Key Takeaways: Social Integration and Suicide Durkheim concluded that the more socially integrate and connected a person is, the less likely he or she is to commit suicide. As social integration decreases, people are more likely to commit suicide. Overview of Durkheim's Text Suicide offers an examination of how suicide rates at the time differed by religion. Specifically, Durkheim analyzed differences between Protestants and Catholics. He found a lower rate of suicide among Catholics and theorized that this was due to stronger forms of social control and cohesion among them than among Protestants. Demographics of Suicide: Study Findings Additionally, Durkheim found that suicide was less common among women than men, more common among single people than among those who are romantically partnered, and less common among those who have children. Further, he found that soldiers commit suicide more often than civilians and that curiously, rates of suicide are higher during peacetime than they are during wars. Correlation vs. Causation: Suicides Driving Forces Based on his gleanings from data, Durkheim argued that suicide can be a result not only of psychological or emotional factors but of social factors as well. Durkheim reasoned that social integration, in particular, is a factor. The more socially integrated a person is- connected to society, possessing of a feeling of general belonging and a sense that life makes sense within the social context- the less likely he or she is to commit suicide. As social integration decreases, people are more likely to commit suicide. Durkheims Typology of Suicide Durkheim developed a theoretical typology of suicide to explain the differing effects of social factors and how they might lead to suicide: Anomic suicide is an extreme response by a person who experiences anomie,  a sense of disconnection from society and a feeling of not belonging resulting from weakened social cohesion. Anomie occurs during periods of serious social, economic, or political upheaval, which result in quick and extreme changes to society and everyday life. In such circumstances, a person might feel so confused and disconnected that they choose to commit suicide.​Altruistic suicide is often a result of excessive regulation of individuals by social forces such that a person may be moved to kill themselves for the benefit of a cause or for society at large. An example is someone who commits suicide for the sake of a religious or political cause, such as the infamous Japanese Kamikaze pilots of World War II, or the hijackers that crashed the airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania in 2001. In such social circumstances, people are so strongly integrated into s ocial expectations and society itself that they will kill themselves in an effort to achieve collective goals. Egoistic suicide  is a profound response executed by people who feel totally detached from society. Ordinarily, people are integrated into society by work roles, ties to family and community, and other social bonds. When these bonds are weakened through retirement or loss of family and friends, the likelihood of egoistic suicide increases. Elderly people, who suffer these losses most profoundly, are highly susceptible to egoistic suicide.Fatalistic suicide  occurs under conditions of extreme social regulation resulting in oppressive conditions and a denial of the self and of agency. In such a situation a person may elect to die rather than continue enduring the oppressive conditions, such as the case of suicide among prisoners.